Green or Not?
July 29th, 2008First, let’s start with what the term “Green” really means? There are hundreds of interpretations and different opinions of what it means to be green, starting with Kermit the Frog, but in the 21st century, if you ask someone over the age of 15 what the term Green means, you’ll probably be hard pressed to find someone who says it’s a color. To me the term “green” means, in a nutshell, environmentally friendly; but I did a little research to find out what some others thought it meant and I’ve listed a few of those below:
Green is a term used to describe anything constructed with minimal negative impact to the environment and with an emphasis on conservation of resources, energy efficiency, and healthful interior spaces (www.skyscraper.org).
On www.sustainer.org they say that there are 10 Key Values to becoming Green: Nature, Democracy, Responsibility, Nonviolence, Community, Economy, Humanity, Diversity, Peace, and Sustainability; going into detail about each one and also how they jive with conservative & liberal views (I for one don’t see how the green movement has anything to do with politics).
Green Building is a simple concept – design building and land use to save energy and reduce waste (www.weho.org).
“Something that’s green takes into consideration that people and the environment are tied together. Green is the assumption that taking care of our host planet is the same as taking care of ourselves (It’s Earth Day 2007, http://blogs.earthsky.org/ryanbritton/ ). “
Green means “practicing institutional ecology and increasing awareness of environmentally sustainable development (Environmental U., http://blogs.earthsky.org/ryanbritton/ ).”
If you’re still aching for more there are a million definitions to this simple word covering the World Wide Web, but the majority of them are very similar to the ones I have listed above, including my own, and seem to hold a very vague and general view about what this insanely popular term means.
One article I found extremely interesting during my search for the definition of the word green was an article published a few weeks back by Forbes, When Green Building Harms the Environment, http://www.forbes.com/realestate/2008/07/15/green-home-decisions-forbeslife-cx_mw_0715realestate.html . It talks about attempting to sort through all the green mumbo-jumbo and determine which materials really do constitute as tried and true green, from production to installation, through life and possibly into the trash. Although many products are made out of recycled material, for instance, Carpet, at the end of the day is it really an environmentally friendly product, even if it you find a manufacturer that is using environmentally friendly practices and this particular product is not backed in vinyl? Carpet required a lot of cleaning (vacuuming, which is not an energy saving process), collects a lot of dust, grime, and stains, and tends to have a very limited lifespan, because of how dirty it gets. Reclaimed Hardwood on the other hand is 100% recycled, easy to clean without using energy (besides human energy, of course), and has a very long lifespan (because it can easily be sanded and refinished to look brand new over and over). It also can now be installed and finished without using toxic glues or environmentally harmful chemicals.
Recycled Carpet is just one of the many examples of a green product that may not fit into every aspect of the green definition. Another popular product these days is Concrete, which is “very durable, all natural and technically recyclable,” but has a particularly harmful manufacturing process. Possibly this is the reason the term “Green” is so hard to define, because anything man made seems to have some impact on the environment, but being able to determine what kind of impacts we are having and strive to limit them is a move in the green direction to me.
